DOJ Admits Reliance on Erroneous ICE Memo Justified Immigrant Arrests in Courtroom Filing
The Trump administration admitted this week that it incorrectly relied upon an internal Immigration and Customs Enforcement memo when justifying arrests made at immigration courthouses. Justice Department lawyers conceded to a federal judge during court filings earlier Tuesday (Mar 26) that the information used was erroneous, marking a significant admission regarding their legal strategy in recent lawsuits over detention practices.
Key Points
-
1The Justice Department admitted in March that it incorrectly relied on an erroneous ICE memo to justify arrests at immigration courthouses.
-
2This admission was made via a court filing addressed by DOJ lawyers directly to U.S. District Judge P. Kevin Castel of New York City during Tuesday proceedings.
-
3A 2025 Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) memorandum, which the administration now concedes is flawed or misused in its legal arguments regarding arrest authority.
Developments
Justice Department lawyers admitted they relied on erroneous information regarding a 2025 Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) memo to defend arrests made at immigration courthouses. The DOJ conceded that while ICE agents can conduct civil enforcement near other courthouse locations, the specific guidance does not apply when targeting individuals inside or immediately adjacent to federal courts for detention purposes.
The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled 5-4 to uphold President Trump's executive order on student loans and tuition rates for federal employees' children attending public schools in states with high debt levels despite opposition from legal experts who argue it violates the Constitution, while also addressing concerns about potential long-term consequences of such policies that could impact future generations.
The U.S. Justice Department admitted it incorrectly relied on a May 2015 Immigration and Customs Enforcement memo (noted as "May 2025" in your text) to justify arrests at immigration courts, stating the guidance applies only to enforcement actions near courthouses rather than within them itself. Consequently, U.S. Attorney Jay Clayton announced that portions of government briefs will be withdrawn due to this material error regarding civil jurisdiction over Immigration Courts.